Skip to main content

In light of a recent "world record" for a treadmill marathon set here in CT, Dave Monti of Race Results Weekly asks:

quote:
Do any of you have any evidence that Eric Blake actually ran a certified 42,195 meters on this treadmill, the internationally recognized distance for a standard marathon? Most treadmills are dreadfully inaccurate in terms of distance. Is there even a certification process for treadmills?


When I've seen these done, there is usually a surveyor's wheel affixed to the front handrail in such a way that it contacts the moving belt near the front of the machine. It seems this would allow it to bounce somewhat and lose contact - this could make the "course" long or short, I suppose.

I think the only truly accurate method would be to paint a stripe on the belt, then use a tape to measure the actual circumfrance of the belt, then figure out the distance mathematically.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Jim,

Your method would work. Also, a calibrated bike could be used in conjunction with a stopwatch.

I've always wondered about those treadmill "records" and competitions, and how they assured fairness, but figured they were a sideshow anyway and didn't let things get in a twist.

All in all, a surveyor's wheel resting on the belt seems a pretty practical approach to the problem.
Last edited by peteriegel

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×