Skip to main content

Running: Cavanagh is detailed in measuring courses
Pete Colaizzo, For the Poughkeepsie Journal 4:29 p.m. EST January 20, 2015

http://www.poughkeepsiejournal...ng-courses/22024671/

Ask Brian Cavanagh his age, and his answer (as of Jan. 12) will be 58.507813 years. Why the extreme specificity about his length of time on this planet? Well, here's the thing. Among his many roles in the sport of distance running and track and field, Cavanagh is most well-known now as an official course certifier — ensuring that road races are measured to the exacting standards of the United States track and field governing body, USATF.

USATF-certified courses are essential for earning qualifying marks for races such as the Boston Marathon. But they are also crucial in ensuring that the race distance you are running is the race distance you are running … no matter what your fancy GPS watch says.

So. Back to a middle-aged man's excruciating explanation of his exact age: "We always calculate to seven decimals when doing USATF measurement calculations,'' Cavanagh said. Yes. Of course! We all knew that, right?

Cavanagh has certified more than 80 local and regional races, including the Mid-Hudson Road Runners Club's Dutchess County Classic. His latest and greatest challenge has been certifying the three races of the highly anticipated Walkway Marathon event on June 13 — the marathon, half marathon and 5-kilometer races. In order to do this, Cavanagh has spent countless hours on his specifically calibrated bicycle in the frigid cold of early winter, making sure that the 26.2-mile, 13.1-mile and 3.1-mile races are accurately measured.

I did a lengthy interview with Cavanagh via email. Simple queries elicited responses in the hundreds of words. Such is his attention to detail, a key trait for someone charged with the important task of officially measuring road race courses. For the sake of brevity, I've whittled down his responses today to give you a glimpse into the world of an official course measurer.

What got him started in measuring courses? Back when he was a competitive runner, Cavanagh ran 1:16:40 for a 13.1-mile half marathon. The only problem was, the course was not accurate. More likely, it was about a half-mile short of this. He based a future marathon race strategy on this supposed time, and he ended up running a too-fast pace in the 26.2-miler.

"I have come to feel that race directors have a responsibility for providing an accurate course — not just T-shirts, bagels and beer,'' Cavanagh said. "The track doesn't lie, the stopwatch doesn't lie and a road race course distance shouldn't either.''

The race measurement certification process is painstaking and can even be dangerous — Cavanagh once broke his shoulder avoiding a driver running a stop sign while measuring a course. USATF-certified courses need to be measured within 0.08 percent of accuracy on two separate measurements of each course. For a marathon, that calculates to 110.748 feet; for a half marathon, the two measurements need to be within 55.374 feet; for a 5K, it's 13.12 feet.

While 110 feet might seem like a lot, the microscopic percentage of error ensures that the course distance is accurate. Ah. But, what about your GPS watch that told you that you ran 26.5 miles at the NYC Marathon instead of the accurate 26.2 miles?

Don't get Cavanagh started on GPS watches. Short story: He's not a big fan. Long story: He's not a big fan.

"Instead of being within 0.0002607 to 0.0090842 miles, I have seen GPS measurements that were commonly off by 0.200000 to 0.400000 miles over a half marathon, which is crazy when you think about the magnitude of their error and how much stock some runners place in their GPS,'' he said.

Perhaps the most important factor in accurate measurements is that the measuring device on the bicycle must be re-calibrated before and after each and every use. This separates it from what Cavanagh feels are the very flawed personal measurement devices that many runners use.

"GPS is based on an estimation, not an actual pinpointing, of where you are,'' he said. "GPS technology, Nike+ watches, Fitbit bands and the like are wonderful devices for motivating people to get out the door to be more active, to inspire them to grow in fitness and confidence, but they are not as accurate as people need and want them to be.''

During a four-day period in late December, Cavanagh biked 116 miles in a chilly four-day period and 249 miles total to get accurate measurements. As his injury can attest, course measurement is not easy. The Walkway courses afforded him the luxury of a mostly traffic-free environment in which to ply his trade.

Still, Cavanagh needed to ride within one foot of the inside of every curve and this was challenging on the ever popular Walkway on a Saturday measuring ride. "Excuse me." "Coming through." "Marathon measurement." "On your right." "On your left." "Behind you." Those were some highlights of Cavanagh's vocabulary during his measurement days. "Most people were cooperative and I thank them for it,'' he said.

In June, Cavanagh said he hopes to be among the many excited runners lining up for the Walkway half marathon. Unlike that long-ago, pseudo-fast race, he will know for a fact that every inch of the 13.1 miles was accurately measured. And don't worry. Cavanagh's nose hasn't been buried in his calibrated measuring devices. "The courses are beautiful and spectacular,'' he said. "Runners will love the area.''

Like everything else he has done with the Walkway races, Cavanagh's statement is accurate.

Mid-Hudson Road Runners Club member Pete Colaizzo, the track coach at Marist College in Poughkeepsie, writes on running every week in Players. He can be reached at runhed246@hotmail.com. For more club information, go to www.mhrrc.org
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Other than Brian being a measurer, and not an "official course certifier", the article is good.

We need to do a better job of making sure people know that the person who measures the course is a measurer, not a certifier. Even us certifiers are only measurers while we are measuring the course. We are not a certifier until we do that aspect of the process.
A course measurer wrongly identified as Certifier is very similar to the public misunderstanding of GPS device measurements versus a USATF Certified course measurement. The June 2014 position statement issued on the use of GPS devices went a long way in clarifying the confusion. Likewise a simple statement could be added at the top of the Course Measurers Search page http://www.usatf.org/events/courses/measurers/. Maybe the List of Measurer Standards could be updated further with the distinction between measurer and certifier?

There are other contributing factors to this too common measurer versus certifier misunderstanding like the Just4Running website http://www.just4running.com/Race-Services still listing course measurers as USATF Course Measurer & Certifier. Course measurement has become a business and with any endeavor for hire we seek to legitimize ourselves. The closer connection with the governing body as a USATF Certifier is a bigger hat of distinction.

Personally I think some of the confusion comes from the fact that anyone can measure a course for certification. Yet most in the running community believe that there is a specific training we have to undergo. The AIMS/IAAF course measurer tier system seems less ambiguous - Course measurers are either “A”, “B” or “C”.
Last edited by kevinplucas
I'm looking for the "Like" button…
I must be using Facebook too much! Smiler

All of us on this forum value accuracy to a high degree, and I am happy to see such dedication to accuracy. I thought it might help if I clarified a few things about the article written about my doing USATF measurement work.

First, I did describe myself as a measurer to the reporter. He is a very good coach and writer. He is dedicated to his craft but just made a few simple mistakes. Despite this, I am happy that the public is getting the main points about accurate course measurement. The author had fun writing the article from the voluminous notes I sent him, the public have had fun reading it, and this has made people more receptive to learning about measurement when there is some humor involved.

Some quotes from what I sent the author of the newspaper article:

"I‘m a retired Health Educator (K-12) with a BS degree in Health Education and a Masters Degree in Science Education. I haven’t gotten the PhD (Piled Higher & Deeper) degree yet! Active USA Track & Field Certified Coach (track & field / cross country), USA Track & Field Course Measurer, have coached track & field / cross country from third graders (learning to play at the sport) to the professional level."

"Measuring courses to USATF standard of accuracy since 2001."

"How much time does it take? The time it takes is highly variable from course to course, and as of Jan 5, I am still working on the Walkway race measurement process after having begun on-site measurement work Dec 16. I am now on the map-making and official documentation phase of applying for USATF Certification after biking the courses numerous times and collecting pages and pages of data and documentation that I have been checking and cross-checking for accuracy. See article I wrote at http://sullivanstriders.org/usatf_course_accuracy.htm "

"Any race director claiming their race is USATF Certified must provide the certification number with that claim. For example, The Hand in Hand 5K to be held in April on The Walkway was assigned Course # NY14149JG. It was New York State’s 149th course of 2014 that was certified as accurate by Jim Gilmer of USA Track & Field, the governing organization for our sport at the Olympic level. The Dutchess Rail Trail 300 Meter Calibration course between the two former railroad bridges over Fairview Ave and the Conrail right of way closer to The Walkway was assigned NY14153JG because it was the 153rd course to achieve this distinction. All measurements of the Walkway races were subsequently based on calibration done on this calibration course which I had steel-taped in two directions, averaged, then applied USATF’s mathematical formula which corrects the measurement for temperature since the tape expands above 68F and shrinks below that temperature."

"Next in the process of obtaining certification will be putting the data onto the USATF forms and making the detailed course maps. I use a mapping program called Ortelius. I import a screenshot of a map from MapMyRun or Google maps, trace over it with Ortelius’ tools, add labels, arrows, notes; detailed information which USA Track & Field requires.
"I will submit the maps and documentation to Jim Gilmer of USATF. He is the NY State Certifier for USATF. After his analysis and inspection of the data and maps, he determines whether to award certification or not. So far I have worked on 82 courses which have received USATF certification. These will be the 83rd to 85th. In some of these cases such as a few months after I broke my shoulder avoiding a driver running a stop sign, my friend Bob Harris calibrated and rode the bike and then I directed him in my car as he did the measurements."

I can understand why the author thought I had broken my shoulder when measuring, even though I really broke it on a recreational training ride months prior to being asked to measure a race. A really unusual piece of trivia here: only two hours before this January 2008 recreational ride, I had spoken on the phone with a person from the Yonkers Recreation Dept. who was asking what was involved in measuring their new half and full Yonkers Marathon courses!

Thank you to everybody who posts on this forum. You contribute to the accuracy of road race courses in "immeasurable ways", pun intended. Smiler

Regards,
Brian Cavanagh,
Course Measurer

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×