Skip to main content

At the end of this past summer I did some testing on the calibration course on the road in front of my house with 3 different tires in different conditions. I measured the change in the calibration constant from the morning, when temperatures are lower, to the afternoon, when temperatures are higher, with different tires and with different initial conditions of the tires. The purpose was to determine the tire and the initial conditions that give the smallest change due to change in temperature, and also determine what really matters when you are trying to get the smallest change in cal constant from morning to afternoon.

You can see a description of my test procedure and the results at the link below.

https://docs.google.com/docume...RK8/edit?usp=sharing

I will probably continue this testing next summer. Specifically, I'm interested in testing a mountain bike type tire with knobby thick tread, just to see how bad things can get for changing cal constant. Or maybe not. That's one reason why it's good to do testing, to make sure the things we think we know are actually true.

I'd also like to test solid tires, but I don't have any to test. If someone else would like to do those tests, that would be great.

Last edited by Admin
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Interesting study, Mark. I've always wondered how different mile measured splits might end up being when, for instance, I measure a marathon like Baltimore, which requires many hours, where temperatures rise and fall over the course of the measurement, causing mile splits to increase midday and then decrease a little towards evening - as they would be revealed to be if measured via steel tape. I have yet to hear any complaints.

Your research project would seem to me to imply that the differences in constant attributable to the tire types you tested aren't large enough to cause concern. Do you agree?

I wonder, like you, if a solid tire would produce radically different results. I also wonder if the coming "Smart Tire" or one of the other airless tires in development would produce significantly different results. What are your thoughts?

We should all be concerned with the sensitivity of cal constant to temperature change. Most measurements are done in the morning, so the temperature when the pre-cal is done is usually cooler than the temperature during the course measurement. This results in courses that are slightly longer than they need to be.

So for the most accurate measurements we would like to have the cal constant sensitivity to temperature changes to be as small as possible. There are many who suggest using narrow tires with high pressure will minimize cal constant sensitivity to temperature change. But the ideal gas law says the pressure change in your tire due to an increase in temperature will be the same regardless of the initial pressure and the initial volume of your tire. Using a narrow tire with high pressure isn't going to make your cal constant less sensitive to temperature change.

My experiments provide additional evidence that this is the case. The sensitivity of your cal constant to temp change is going to be pretty much the same no matter what tire width you use (assuming your wide tire still has a thin tread) and no matter what initial tire pressure you have. There really isn't a need to pump up your tire to 100psi every time you measure.

Tire "type" does matter. The thicker treaded tire in my experiments did have higher sensitivity to temp change than the thinner treaded tire.

I didn't test solid tires. And since the ideal gas law doesn't apply to them I have no idea what their cal constant sensitivity to temperature change would be.

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×