Skip to main content

Here's an article, titled Chicago marathoners: Take tight turns — or risk longer run that mentions our own RRTC Illinois state certifier. Dave Wight. The article appeared in the Chicago Sun Times on Sep 9, 2013. The complete article and photos are available online at:

http://www.suntimes.com/...risk-longer-run.html

I pasted the text below.

Enjoy. -- Justin

~~~~~

Chicago marathoners: Take tight turns — or risk longer run
BY MITCH DUDEK Staff Reporter September 9, 2013 6:34PM

Attention Bank of America Chicago Marathon runners who signed up to run 26.2 miles and not a step further: Take tight turns.

Runners who don’t hug the 36 turns along the marathon route could unwittingly add up to a half mile to their race, resulting in unwanted extra minutes to their finishing time, according to rough calculations by Jay Wight, who measures Chicago’s course for USA Track and Field and, for the first time Friday, put some thought into the matter.

“Over a course that long, with that many turns, if you’re not running the tightest line, you’re going to be adding significant distance,” said Wight.

Marathon rookies are especially vulnerable.

“Beginners have a tendency to drift,” said marathon guru and author Hal Higdon. “Concentration is not easy for 26 miles.”

But choosing the perfect line is not always possible while navigating hordes of runners. A total of 45,000 people are signed up for the Oct. 13 race.

“The packs are so large that you can’t necessarily run where you want to run until things get spread out,” said Wight.

Bottlenecks have been known to form around early turns.

“Sometimes the straight line isn’t the fastest line,” said Higdon. “Basically you sort of have to think ahead and try to anticipate in advance.”

As of Tuesday, runners have 33 days to prepare.

Email: mdudek@suntimes.com
Twitter: @mitchdudek

# # #
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

A friend rode in front of the lead man in the Crim 10 mile about 5 weeks ago and noted the runner was a LONG ways from running the SPR. In fact, he dropped back a time or 2 to suggest he follow him to run less distance. The runner, who missed the course record by 10 seconds, failed to listen. I've noted this among leaders on a regular basis: they're more interested in the race, than the pace. If the leaders aren't tuned in to a nominal distance, it's unlikely the masses, on the whole, are any better informed or interested in running the SPR. Those w/Garmins find the extra distance added to their final total, which is typically 1 part in 100 long already. And so it goes & goes...

Add Reply

Post
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×