As a believer in free enterprise, I would never be in favor of RRTC or USATF mandating or recommending certain certification fees. For one thing, some courses are relatively easy to measure, while one of the same distance might be complicated and time-consuming. Imagine the Marine Corps Marathon, traversing two states, several law enforcement jurisdictions, Interstate highways, and National Park Service properties. Bob Thurston charges an hourly rate for this work. It just wouldn't make sense any other way. Then, there are the cost of living differences from city to city and state to state. There are differences in the quality of the final product from measurer to measurer e.g. the map.
I modeled my fee structure somewhat on Duane Russell's excellent web site. Some clients I work with require a design from scratch, then tweaks or changes as required by the permitting authorities. I took this a step further a few years ago, charging an hourly rate for course design, permitting, police coordination, course layout, and other related services.
If some measurers want to charge low fees, that is his/her business. The one thing that bugs me about measuring fees is that there is such a wide variety of fees charged by measurers working in the greater D.C. area that shopping goes on here all the time. I get a referral for a measurement. I send out a list of certified courses in their area, my fee structure, sample maps, and sometimes a quick analysis of the course. Then, sometimes, I hear nothing back because the shopper calls or emails measurers around the region until he/she feels he/she has hit the bottom price, and feels no need to advise me or some other measurer accordingly.
A few months ago, many of us on this list serve were approached via email from a shopper. I can guess many of us wasted time crafting responses to her. I do not know who finally got the job - if there actually was a multi-event measurement job as stated.
I do not know what to do about this. There probably isn't anything anyone can do.