Skip to main content

Reply to "Work Reduction"

Daune, again here are my comments on all your parts to the process.

Your 1st idea!
Initially, VCs would enter the data from the certs we receive. I already enter much of it into my own db. Then, the Registrar would review it. If there was an error, he could correct it. BUT, part of the entry process is having programmed calculations. We enter elevations, and Drop is calculated. No error, unless we fat-finger the entry. Same with Separation - it is calculated by the Web page.

The above comment is interesting, but how difficult is to calculate the drop/sep?

Your 2nd idea!
Once that is proven to be smooth, then Certifiers would enter the information. Once entered, the VC would review, and "release" to the Registrar. Again, all calculations are automatic. Checking that cert numbers match on map and form is done by VC (and, ultimately, the Registrar), as is Effective Date, etc. VCs can change any errors.

The above comment is interesting, but having a certifier do this is unrealistic. Certifier’s have enough to do. How many certifiers have computers? What do we do with the ones that don't have a computer or don't want to do it!

Your 3rd idea!
Once that is working smoothly, then Measurers would enter their Measurement Data Sheets, and the Application Form in a Web page. Drop-downs, limited choices, etc. When they enter the measurement data, the Interval is calculated, which is a double-check to make sure they didn't mis-enter clicks. Automation and control of input.

Having a measurer do this is really unrealistic. You’re assuming they all use a computer.

All would not be implemented at once. It would be a staggered rollout, so it can be evaluated at each level. But, each phase would ultimately save time, and reduce errors. Even when the Registrar enters data now, there are errors. This would reduce the errors that make it online.

Nice idea, but very unrealistic in the real world.
×
×
×
×