I was reading the Measurement Manual, and in the topic of Maps, the example shown has the splits on a separate page. Isn't the accepted method now to include split descriptions on the same page as the map, so only one sheet of paper must be dealt with?
I looked at Connecticut for examples, as there is a plethora of measurers, hence multiple methodologies. I did notice however, that recently, nearly every map has the splits on the same page as the map. If that many measurers can do it for all course lengths, would it not be a good idea to require it? If so, that would necessitate a change in the posted manual.
Am I being too finicky?
Original Post