Skip to main content

Reply to "RRTC Meeting in Indianapolis"

I can't attend this year, but here are my comments:

A - Yes
B - Ok
C - No, it eventually becomes awarded to whoever's next.
D - I don't have a problem with the course description field as it is now.
E - I've never had a difference of more than 1/2 inch. But, if we introduce an allowable difference, we should describe a remedy for occasions when the two measurements are out of range.
F - I don't have a problem with Certifiers being USATF members.
G - No. Is USATF that desperate for membership?
H - I thought this was already established.
I - I don't have a problem with a fee, but if it's just a clerical correction, I don't see a need for a new cert number.
J - Yes. I know the applicaiton has always asked for copies, but I doubt that certifiers have enforced this one. I do think that the application should show the cert number for the cal course that was used when measuring a course.
×
×
×
×