Skip to main content

Reply to "New Proposed Methods"

Mike and Mark give theoretical reasons as to why the 25-m calibration will not work, but ignore the fact that it has worked perfectly for the many times I have tried it: in a real-life situation it gave a calibration factor that deviated from that derived from a 400-m course by only negative 0.008%. I am reminded of the fact that eminent physicists once proved that it was impossible for man to fly!
×
×
×
×