Skip to main content

Reply to "Measurement data submitted for course Certification."

It will be interesting to see exactly what proposal is being talked about. We see that people are in favor of something, but exactly what is it? The proposal has changed its shape and scope several times.

If one adjusts a course in 2010 that was originally measured and certified in 2006, this is not a renewal at all. It is a new course that used old data to cover a partial measurement of the new course. What's wrong witrh using old data?

This is routinely done in measuring marathon courses, and ought not to be penalized. It adds work and cost, to no perceptible benefit.
Last edited by peteriegel
×
×
×
×