A preliminary list of measurers who might be graded under the proposed scheme has been created. The complete file may be found at:
http://members.aol.com/riegelpete/Performance2004_2006.pdf
Here is a summary:
2004 - 2006
Measured 10 or more 99
Measured 5 or more 165
Total Measurers 446
2006 Only
Measured 10 or more 37
Measured 5 or more 76
Total Measurers 258
Question: What purpose does this serve aside from curiosity satisfaction? This information has appeared in somewhat different form each year for decades, in Measurement News, and lately online.
In addition, information concerning measurers is also presently available on the USATF search engine.
The information was prepared by downloading the latest course list from the USATF web site. The basic information is available to all.
Should a numerical limit be established to decide who is A, B, C or whatever?
Should appointments be perpetual or should they only be good for the last few years? What have you done for us lately?