Grading Measurers?
This idea was brought forth also, and also to mixed acceptance. A strictly numerical approach, based on the amount of measurement activity done by the measurer, while it has drawbacks, has the advantage of being apolitical and avoids hard feelings. It is easy to do and I will be preparing a sample listing. When I do, discussion will be invited.
I am lukewarm to this idea, as any person wishing to check out the kind of work a measurer is doing can find it out by going to the measurer list on our web page, finding the measurers in their state, and looking at a listing of the courses measured. Also, they can see the maps and get an idea of the quality of the work.
It was not stated exactly to what use this listing would be put. Opinions are solicited.
Original Post