At the risk of being a broken record (does anybody else remember those?) I stand with Jim on this.
How do we, as certifiers, explain to a race director whose course has not changed that he has to have is course remeasured, and how do we defend this as something other than, as Jim says, "bureaucratically induced busy work" that simply generates fees for measurers and certifiers at the expense of race directors?
And who is the RRTC "board"?
This could be solved EASILY by allowing the original measurer to re-submit original measurement data. We impress on the measurers that they're on the hook if the course fails, and we leave it up to them whether or not they need think they need to re-measure the course- even once.
We need to make this consistent and easy to explain to our customers- the people who promote and administer road races.