First, in my view this is the wrong place for this as it should be presented to the Council.
Second, as Pete stated there are too many varibles here for this to work.
1. Maps scanned in the correct format(this will not work). How dos the certifier enter his information on the map(effective date and Certificate number)?
2. Do you think all have scanners?
3. The database can only be handled by one person to upload to USATF as well as the maps. You guys don't understand the process.
3. Yes, to have generic sheet for submitting data to a Certifier could work, but the Certifier must see the paper work.
4. Where is there a reduced workload?
5. Are there that many mistakes?
The system we have is working. This is a computer age, but some of these ideas in my view just will not work.