What is the appropriate response(s) for a certifier or measurer who becomes aware, after the fact, that one or more key points of an active certified course (start, finish and/or turnaround -- not the route itself) were altered on race day in such a way as to shorten the SPR distance? (Because runners had complained that the course was long as measured by their GPS devices -- but that's beside the point.) A complicating factor it that the course is part of a competitive regional series of races that advertise and require all events be competed on a certified road course.
Thanks for any and all comments.
Jim
Original Post