Road Course Measurement Bulletin Board    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Course Measurement  Hop To Forums  Electronic Measurement    Protege 9 experience
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
Protege 9 experience
 Login/Join
 
Picture of Gene Newman
posted
This last week I have been doing random measurements with both the EC and the JR counter. The ratio between the devices should be 23.636363.. and I have found that to be the case. I have been extremely careful when doing this experiment.

However, if you aren't careful the electronic counter will add revolutions with a slight movement of the wheel. If one extra revolution is added, then your course could be short by about 7'. How many times does a measurer stop? If this happens then errors could occur.

Certifiers have no way in knowing how careful a measurer has been in doing their work. This type of error can't happen with the JR Counter.

This message has been edited. Last edited by: Gene Newman,
 
Posts: 885 | Registered: 26 October 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
Picture of Jim Gerweck
posted Hide Post
In the time I have been measuring w/ a Protegé, I have had the wheel stop within 0.05 of the Zero mark maybe half a dozen times, if that. It seems pretty easy to avoid potential problems, and yet I agree w/ Gene there is no way to be sure a measurer has taken those steps.
 
Posts: 744 | Location: Norwalk, CT | Registered: 24 October 2004Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
As a careful measurer using Protege 9, I found a certain peace of mind in mounting two ECs on the wheel, each with a separate magnet. I would know immediately if an extra pulse was received. I also have the wheel marked with a thin strip of duct tape at the zero mark, and another of a different color at the 180 degree point. As I approach a stop, I am careful to stop as close to the 180 degree point as possible, to avoid the chance of a stray pulse. The small extra cost of the second EC is easily overcome by the reduced anxiety!
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
posted Hide Post
One other point. Some have suggested that a JR counter might be used along side of electronic counters for verification purposes, but with a Protege counter, that might pose a problem. The Protege counters require an extra revolution each time they are zeroed, to prime the counter, so to speak. (The real reason is a bit more obscure.) Depending on how often the EC is zeroed, and an extra rotation added, the two methods might not seem to agree.

By the way, I dont think cost is the central issue in selecting a counter. The real cost is the opportunity cost, and that is going to be the same regardless.
 
Posts: 8 | Registered: 17 February 2006Reply With QuoteReport This Post
  Powered by Social Strata  
 

    Road Course Measurement Bulletin Board    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Course Measurement  Hop To Forums  Electronic Measurement    Protege 9 experience