Road Course Measurement Bulletin Board    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Race Administration  Hop To Forums  Timing    Fastest runner not the winner
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Picture of Pete Riegel
Posted
Here's a good story about a mess. Received from Gordon Rogers.

Nike Women's Marathon in San Francisco

This is almost unbelievable. How can the fastest runner not be the winner?

Both SF and Nike are getting well-deserved bad publicity.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/20/BAUC13L3GQ.DTL


Pete Riegel
 
Posts: 1193 | Location: Columbus, Ohio, USA | Registered: 23 October 2004Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Mark Neal
Posted Hide Post
The silliest part of this whole story is that they have a separate "elite" start for women who can't run faster than 3:06.
 
Posts: 274 | Location: Rochester, MI | Registered: 13 April 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Picture of Duane Russell
Posted Hide Post
I think this is a great story! It appears that there may be more runners who are able to run quality times, but either don't go through the paperwork to become recognized as "elite", or don't have the connections.

I doubt there are many people who can compete with the "elites", but this is a very good example why you shouldn't have separate starts for the citizens and elites.

Nike had a point, though, that it was a separate race. I'm glad they learned something from this experience. It should make other events aware of separate starts, too.
 
Posts: 199 | Location: Denver, Colorado | Registered: 09 May 2006Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

    Road Course Measurement Bulletin Board    Forums  Hop To Forum Categories  Race Administration  Hop To Forums  Timing    Fastest runner not the winner